January 7, 2025
In the vibrant world of house music, Dutch duo ANOTR has emerged as one of the most exciting and innovative acts of recent years. Comprised of Jesse van der Heijden and Oguzhan Guney, ANOTR has...
Read moreJanuary 7, 2025
PARTYNEXTDOOR, the enigmatic Canadian singer, songwriter, and producer, has emerged as a pivotal figure in reshaping the landscape of modern R&B. Born Jahron Anthony Brathwaite in Mississauga...
Read moreJanuary 7, 2025
Few entertainers have embodied charisma, charm, and effortless talent quite like Dean Martin. Known as the King of Cool, Martin was more than just a singer or actor—he was a cultural icon whose...
Read moreDecember 25, 2024
Ahmir “Questlove” Thompson, the Grammy and Oscar-winning musician and filmmaker, is set to direct a music documentary celebrating the 50th anniversary of Saturday Night Live. Known for his...
Read moreDecember 25, 2024
Blondie, the legendary new wave band that has defined decades of music, has officially confirmed their next album, set to release in 2025. The iconic group is teaming up with renowned producer...
Read moreDecember 25, 2024
At just 20 years old, The Kid LAROI has already cemented his status as one of the most exciting and influential young artists in the music industry. Born Charlton Kenneth Jeffrey Howard in Sydney...
Read moreDecember 25, 2024
Clairo, born Claire Cottrill, has emerged as one of the most authentic and innovative voices in contemporary music. The 25-year-old singer-songwriter first gained attention in 2017 with her viral...
Read moreDecember 25, 2024
In 2024, amidst the dynamic world of popular music, few artists have made waves quite like Tyla. Emerging from Johannesburg—fondly called “Joburg” by locals—the South African singer has transformed...
Read moreDecember 25, 2024
In the realm of modern hip-hop, few artists have managed to leave as profound an impact in as short a time as Dayvon Daquan Bennett, better known by his stage name, King Von. Born on August 9, 1994...
Read moreDecember 25, 2024
A shocking turn of events has rocked the music industry as a judge has ordered Adele’s hit song “Million Years Ago” to be removed from all streaming platforms globally. The decision comes after a...
Read moreDecember 25, 2024
In a surprising twist worthy of a thriller, previously unheard Michael Jackson music has been unearthed from an abandoned storage unit. The discovery, which has sent shockwaves through the music...
Read moreDecember 24, 2024
Over the past decade, Future has built a legacy that defies convention. Narcotized, addled, and tender by turns, his music is a kaleidoscope of trap ballads, twerk anthems, trippy blues, and...
Read more
Music creators often walk a delicate line between drawing inspiration from their favorite songs and unintentionally infringing on the work of others. The recent lawsuit filed against Miley Cyrus over her hit song "Flowers" serves as a reminder of how blurry this line can be. The lawsuit claims that Cyrus’ track borrows too much from Bruno Mars’ "When I Was Your Man," sparking a legal debate over where inspiration ends and copyright infringement begins.
For music creators, this situation offers valuable insights into how creativity, influence, and the law intersect.
Many artists naturally incorporate elements from songs they love into their own music. Whether it’s a melodic similarity, a lyrical nod, or a harmonic influence, drawing from existing material is a well-established practice in the industry. But at what point does inspiration become infringement?
The lawsuit against Cyrus offers a key example of this dilemma. Fans have long speculated that "Flowers" was a response to Mars' "When I Was Your Man." Where Mars sings about the regret of not treating his partner better, Cyrus flips the narrative to one of self-empowerment and independence. On the surface, this appears to be a classic "reply" song—a time-honored tradition in music, especially in genres like hip-hop and rock. But the lawsuit argues that the similarities go beyond thematic response, extending into “melodic, harmonic, and lyrical elements.”
For music creators, understanding what qualifies as fair use or inspiration versus copyright infringement is critical. While it's perfectly acceptable to be influenced by another artist's work, using exact musical phrases, melodies, or chord progressions without permission can lead to legal consequences. This case emphasizes how even perceived thematic similarities can lead to a lawsuit if the overlap is deemed substantial enough.
So how can music creators safely navigate these waters? Here are a few tips:
1. Understand What’s Protected
Music copyright laws protect more than just lyrics. They can extend to melodies, chord progressions, and even specific arrangements. However, not every aspect of a song is subject to copyright protection. General ideas or themes, like writing about heartbreak or self-empowerment, are not protected by copyright. But if you directly copy a melody or key musical elements, you may run into legal trouble.
2. Transform, Don’t Copy
When you find inspiration in a song, aim to transform the elements rather than replicate them. This could mean changing the tempo, key, or instrumentation, or interpreting the song’s emotional essence in a completely different way. In the case of Cyrus and Mars, even though "Flowers" was perceived as a response to "When I Was Your Man," the issue arose because Tempo Music alleges that more than just the lyrics were borrowed—melodic and harmonic structures, along with bass line similarities, are also part of the claim.
3. Study Music Theory
Knowing the technical side of music can help you recognize when your work might be too close to another song. If you can break down the structure of your music and compare it to the original, you'll have a better sense of whether you’re simply being inspired or unintentionally infringing. Learning about different chord progressions, scales, and melodic structures can help you find your own unique voice as a creator.
4. Use Music Creation Tools Carefully
In today’s world of loops, samples, and interpolation, it’s easier than ever to build off someone else’s work. While sampling and interpolation are legal when properly licensed, using these elements without clearance can lead to lawsuits. When you’re incorporating samples or creating interpolations, make sure you’re following the proper legal channels to license these materials.
Throughout music history, we’ve seen high-profile examples of both legitimate inspiration and cases that veered into infringement. Take these two examples to understand how the courts have viewed this fine line:
1. Robin Thicke’s "Blurred Lines"
One of the most famous recent copyright infringement cases, the "Blurred Lines" lawsuit, resulted in a nearly $5 million payout to the estate of Marvin Gaye. The court found that Thicke’s song borrowed too heavily from Gaye’s "Got to Give It Up," even though the songs didn’t share exact lyrics or melodies. The "feel" and groove of the two tracks were deemed too similar, serving as a warning to music creators that even stylistic influences can sometimes lead to legal consequences.
2. Led Zeppelin’s "Stairway to Heaven"
In a case that had a very different outcome, Led Zeppelin was sued by the band Spirit, who claimed that "Stairway to Heaven" copied elements of their song "Taurus." After years of litigation, the courts ultimately ruled in Zeppelin’s favor, finding that the musical similarities between the two songs were too general to constitute infringement. This case highlights that not all similar-sounding elements will result in copyright violation rulings—especially when those similarities stem from common musical tropes or progressions.
The case against Miley Cyrus is still ongoing, and the legal battle may hinge on whether the similarities between "Flowers" and "When I Was Your Man" are too "commonplace" to be protected. If you’re a music creator, there are a few key takeaways from this situation:
At the end of the day, music is a collaborative and evolving art form where influence and inspiration are natural. However, knowing where to draw the line will protect both your artistic integrity and your career from the costly consequences of a lawsuit.
Click the links to hear the similarities and or differences of both songs: